Legal Opinion

In re Muller

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided October 2, 2012No. Nos. 5:10-bk-73265, 5:11-bk-74650, 5:11-bk-74941PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BEN BARRY, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court are six objections to claims that exhibit the most common maladies in this area of bankruptcy law. Because the same law applies to each of these objections, the Court will conjoin the objections for its order. The Court has jurisdiction over these objections under 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and 28 U.S.C. § 157, and the resolution of the objections is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B). The following opinion constitutes findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 7052 and 9014.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Athanasios Konstantinidis and Vasiliki Konstantinidis, His Wife v. C. N. Chen, M. DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Hossaini v. Western Missouri Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. Dove-Nation v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Dove-Nation)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  5. In Re CluffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Korley Sears v. Rhett SearsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. In re CrutchfieldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2013
  3. In re F-Squared Investment Management, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2016
  4. In re MoralesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. In re WalkerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API