Legal Opinion
Williams v. Fresno County Department of Child Support Services
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 21, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00434Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00434-NONE-EPG 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. SCREENING ORDER 14 FRESNO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, et al., 15 (1) FILE A SECOND AMENDED Defendants. COMPLAINT; OR 16 (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE 17 WISHES TO STAND ON HIS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 18 (ECF No. 5) 19 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 20 21 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma 22 pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.