Hillery-Atkins Buick Co. v. Cox
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion, by
LOGSDON, C.
The sole ground of error alleged by plaintiff is that the trial court erred in not granting a permanent injunction as prayed for by plaintiff.
It appears that defendant, J. D. Cox, had procured five separate judgments against the plaintiff in justice court, each for the sum of $200. Each of these cases was appealed to the district court except one, wliicn was appealed to the county court. On such appeals judgment again wtent against the instant plaintiff in each of the five cases for $200. After these judgments had become final, and executions were about to be levied toi…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bank of Buffalo v. VennSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Rives v. Ada Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bud Hoard Co. v. F. Berg & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Ross v. GearinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930