Legal Opinion

State v. Lira

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1988No. 12265PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

Manuel Lira, appealing from a judgment of conviction of two counts of Rape in the First Degree, asserts the Circuit Court of the First Circuit erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the effect of the complaining witness’ consent to the conduct alleged and in denying the motion to dismiss the prosecution on the ground that his right under the state and federal constitutions to a speedy trial was violated. Having reviewed the record of proceedings in the circuit court, we conclude the jury should have been instructed as requested by the defendant. 1 Thus,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Stevenson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. O'DANIELHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hazel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MaelegaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. KikutaHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. SmithHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. HorswillHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. SukaHawaii Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API