Home Pattern Co. v. W. W. Mertz Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover damages for breach of contract to accept and pay for certain patterns to be manufactured and shipped by the plaintiff, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Litchfield County, Tuttle,./.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for 8895, from which the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
On May 21st, 1908, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract of sale, the essential parts of which appear in the statement of the case when it was before us at a former term (86 Conn. 494, 86 Atl. 19). The plaintiff was the manufacturer of the Home Journal Patterns referred to in the contract. Before the time for the first shipment under the contract arrived, the defendant attempted to repudiate its contract, but was notified by the plaintiff that it would not acquiesce in such repudiation. When the time arrived for the initial shipment the plaintiff delivered the goods to the New…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Home Pattern Co. v. W. W. Mertz Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lewis v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- State v. CardwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Katz v. Delohery Hat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Kinney v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Kearns Motor Co. v. Cimino (In Re Dreiling)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.