Legal Opinion

State v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 21, 1969No. 18986PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Chief Justice.

Carl F. Cunningham, the appellant herein was tried upon an indictment containing two counts: (1) Assault with intent to ravish; and (2) Assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. The case came on for trial before The Honorable Clarence E. Singletary, Resident Judge of the Ninth Judicial Ciixuit, and a jury, at the 1968 June Term of the Court of General Sessions for Berkeley County. The jury found the appellant guilty of an assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. He was sentenced to serve a term of ten years on the public works of said county or in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DeBerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. SelfSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. SprouseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. FrazierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. FoxworthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API