Legal Opinion
United States v. Chiarizio
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 21, 1975No. Crim. H-74-51PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT AND SUPPRESS EVI- . DENCE
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
The twelve defendants in this case are under indictment for violation of 18 U. S.C. § 1955 (1970) 1 and § 371 (1970). They have raised a number of challenges to the indictment and the wiretap evidence which was obtained pursuant to the provisions of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520. An evidentiary hearing having been held on certain elements of the defendants’ motion to suppress and all briefs having been submitted, this matter…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Michael ChiarizioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Martin Sklaroff, Reuben Goldstein, and Pearl Leppo, A/K/A Earl LeppoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- In Re Inv. Grand Jury of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- United States v. MartorellaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.