Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 3, 1969No. 5949PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To the House of Representatives:

The undersigned Justices of the Supreme Court return the following answer to the inquiries contained in your resolution of May 6, 1969:

House Bill 708 would authorize municipalities to construct, or cause to be constructed, public parking facilities as therein defined, and to finance the cost of such construction in part by means of assessments against owners or lessees of land receiving special benefits from such facilities, or by the issuance of bonds, fifty per cent of the principal amount of which would be redeemed from such assessments, or from parking…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. LinaresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Pierce v. Town of WellesleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Court Street Parking Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Crampton v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. R. E. Short Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. HL Munn Lumber Company v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  4. Club Jolliet, Inc. v. Manchester & A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. Johnson v. City of LaconiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API