Legal Opinion
In re Masterson
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided August 4, 2016No. CASE NO. 15-12503PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION REGARDING OBJECTION TO CLAIM 3-2
Robert E. Grant, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court
In In re Bryant, this court held that filing an amended claim in response to an objection did not moot the objection; was an unnecessary, if not completely inappropriate, way to respond to the objection; and solved nothing. In re Bryant, 397 B.R. 903, 904 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.2008). The court explained:
[ Ajttempting to amend the claim only confuses the issue, raising questions such as what happens next? Is the whole objection process supposed to start over from the beginning or should scheduled…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James v. Talano, M.D. v. Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Jeffrey Cash v. Illinois Division of Mental Health, D/B/A Warren G. Murray Developmental CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- In Re O'MalleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Hann v. Educational Credit Management Corp. (Hann)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2012
- In Re WatsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Kyeung Guk MinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- In re: Debra Leann McDaniel and Crystal Dawn McDanielUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2026