Legal Opinion

Pentz v. Receivers of Ætna Fire Insurance

New York Court of Chancery

Decided August 29, 1839PublishedCited by 2 opinions

A petition had been presented by William A. F. Pentz, Frederick Pentz and John Pentz against the receivers of the vElna Fire Insurance Company of New-York.

Read the full summary

A petition had been presented by William A. F. Pentz, Frederick Pentz and John Pentz against the receivers of the vElna Fire Insurance Company of New-York. By this petilion it appeared that the petitioners had effected an insurance, in the name of their firm of Pentz & Co., with the said Com-par.y, to the amount of twelve thousand dollars on stores Nos. 55 and 57 Water street in the city of New-York ; and also, an insurance on their merchandize and other articles contained therein to the amount of ten thousand dollars. The stores and the merchandize were destroyed by the great fire, which…

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor :

In making the order, directing the receivers either to adjust the loss claimed by the petitioners and give them a certificate or to proceed and appoint referees according to the statute, the court did not intend to pass *343upon the rights of the parties ; but only to put those rights in a train for adjudication upon the coming in of a report of referees, when the question, whether the petitioners were to be admitted as creditors of the fund in the hands of the receivers and if so for what amount, could be properly presented. That question is now before the court.

It is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ætna Fire Insurance v. TylerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. City Fire Insurance v. CorliesNew York Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. DuerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. MacfarlaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API