Legal Opinion

United States v. Segarra

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 15, 2009No. 08-17181PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

This appeal presents a question of statutory interpretation; we must decide whether the plain language of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) either prohibits or requires consecutive sentences where the defendant is convicted of both a drug and a firearm offense. In relevant part, § 924(c) provides:

Except to the extent that a greater minimum sentence is otherwise provided by this subsection or by any other provision of law, any person who, during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime (including a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime that provides for an enhanced punishment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Gold Star Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Mark Fisher, United States of America v. Devon Sutton, A.K.A. Devon Daniel Sutton, United States of America v. Arthur RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Jonathan SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. EasterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Abbott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. Steven JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. PhaknikoneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Tony Edward DensonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Freddie WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API