Legal Opinion

Industrial Sav. Bank v. Greenwald

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1935No. 6 Div. 622PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Suit by indorsee against Max Greenwald, one of the makers of the promissory note sued on. The complaint consists of a single count. In the complaint it is averred that the note sued on, by due indorsement thereon, ‘‘is held by the plaintiff as a holder in due course thereof.” Thus the plaintiff in the first instance has taken upon himself the burden of proving that he acquired the note in due course of business, for value and before maturity.

Having invoked the protection of the law merchant by his initial pleading, and not by replication, any plea interposed by the defendant,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bessemer Coal, Iron & Land Co. v. DoakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Jones & Co. v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. J. C. Lysle Milling Co. v. North Alabama Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Little v. People's BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Roebuck Auto Sales, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Hendricks v. BlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Kimbrell v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. RLI Ins. Co. v. MLK AVE. REDEVELOP. CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API