Legal Opinion

Roebuck Auto Sales, Inc. v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 3, 1974No. SC 705PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The question in this case is whether a plaintiff is entitled to recover under a detinue count and counts in trover and trespass joined in a bill of complaint. Are the recoveries in the same action totally inconsistent and mutually exclusive? We answer in the negative.

The facts of the case are not overly complex. In February, 1969, Joseph Wallace purchased a 1969 Volkswagen convertible from Roebuck Auto Sales. Apparently, the automobile was bought for Wallace’s daughter, Mary Emily, to use. In June, 1969, Mary Emily wrecked the vehicle, and it was returned to Roebuck for repairs. The repairs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Howton v. MathiasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Ewing v. BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Russell-Vaughn Ford, Inc. v. RouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Industrial Sav. Bank v. GreenwaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. King v. FranklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simmons MacH. Co. Inc. v. M. & M Brokerage, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Brown v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Edwards v. VanzantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Coffee General Hospital v. HendersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  5. Joyce Berry v. United of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API