Legal Opinion

Sullivan Trail Manufacturing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1984No. Appeal, No. 426 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

This is an appeal by the Sullivan Trail Manufacturing Company (Sullivan) of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s award of benefits to Carl Wetzel for total disability under Section 108 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Section 1 of the Act of October 17, 1972, P.L. 930, as amended, 77 P.S. §27.1. We affirm.

On January 27, 1974, Wetzel, who had worked for Sullivan for twenty years in the mining industry, filed a Claim Petition alleging total disability…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robachinski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Campbell Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Odd Fellow's Home v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Fields v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Kanyan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Faust v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API