Faust v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
RODGERS, Senior Judge.
Carolyn L. Faust (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that reversed a decision by a referee granting Claimant’s reinstatement petition. We affirm.
Claimant initially suffered a work-related accident, allegedly injuring her lower back and neck, while employed by Sears Roebuck and Company (Employer) on May 10, 1985. She received benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable. On October 9, 1987, Employer petitioned for a suspension, alleging that Claimant had recovered sufficiently as of July 21, 1987, to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Robachinski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Evans v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hahnemann University Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Flannigan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999