Legal Opinion

Faust v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 6, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

Carolyn L. Faust (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that reversed a decision by a referee granting Claimant’s reinstatement petition. We affirm.

Claimant initially suffered a work-related accident, allegedly injuring her lower back and neck, while employed by Sears Roebuck and Company (Employer) on May 10, 1985. She received benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable. On October 9, 1987, Employer petitioned for a suspension, alleging that Claimant had recovered sufficiently as of July 21, 1987, to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Robachinski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Evans v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hahnemann University Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Flannigan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API