Legal Opinion

Casey v. Wynatol Realty & Hotel Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 18, 1915Published

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District. Action by Mary Casey against the Wynatol Realty & Hotel Company. Judgment for plaintiff after a trial before the court without a jury, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPendleton, J.

The action is for damages alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence. Plaintiff, a cleaner or scrubwoman employed by defendant, an hotel keeper, was injured by cutting herself on a broken glass while endeavoring to get through a window onto the fire escape, and was also burned.

[1] It appears that gasoline was being used for some cleaning purpose by a housekeeper, or houseman, employed by defendant. An explosion occurred, setting fire to the premises, as a result of which plaintiff, being frightened, endeavored to get on the fire escape, and in so doing received the injuries…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wolf v. . American Tract SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Cunningham v. . DadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Scott v. Nauss Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Wetsell v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API