Legal Opinion

Scott v. Nauss Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Nauss Brothers Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of-New York on- the 18tli day of. January, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury for $2,500, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the samé day denying the defendant’s motion for a -new trial made upon "the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J. :

On June .18,1903, the defendant conducted the “ Harlem Stables ” in the city of New York, and in connection therewith maintained, *257operated and controlled a freight elevator used for the hoisting and lowering of freight and other articles from floor to floor in the premises which it occupied. This elevator was of the familiar open type and was operated by hand by means of ropes, by pulling op which it was either raised or lowered.

Plaintiff’s intestate, William A. McGowan, was in defendant’s employ and in the course of his duty was required to assist in the raising of said elevator…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Mullen v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Dougherty v. . MillikenNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Dobbins v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Cunningham v. . DadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nashville Railway & Light Co. v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  2. Adzerycha v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Casey v. Wynatol Realty & Hotel Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API