Bryson v. HAYWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Defendant Haywood Regional Medical Center (“HRMC”) appeals from the trial court’s order granting in part plaintiff Dr. Aloha E. Bryson’s motion to compel discovery of certain documents. On appeal, HRMC contends the trial court erred in concluding that the documents were not privileged under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 131E-95(b) (2009) and in ordering HRMC to produce and disclose those documents to plaintiff. Because HRMC has failed to meet its burden of showing that the documents fall into one of the three categories of privileged material under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 131E-95(b), we affirm.
Facts
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Wagoner v. Elkin City Schools' Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Shelton v. Morehead Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Moody v. Sears Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Adams v. LovetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hammond v. SainiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Hammond v. SainiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- Medlin v. North Carolina Specialty Hospital, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Bryson v. HAYWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- Ray v. B. Keith Forgy, M.D., P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016