Wilson v. Brush Wellman, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} We are asked to consider whether class certification under Civ.R. 23(B)(2) is proper in an action seeking to establish a medical-monitoring fund. Although under the proper circumstances court-ordered medical monitoring may be classified as injunctive relief, we hold that plaintiffs in this action fail to meet the cohesiveness requirement of the rule.
I. Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} Appellees-plaintiffs are members of unions within the Northwestern Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council. Plaintiffs were all employed at various times by contractors at the Brush Wellman Elmore…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Cullen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Hirsch v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Howland v. Purdue Pharma L.P.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
- In re Welding Fume Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.