Legal Opinion

Howland v. Purdue Pharma L.P.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2004No. 2003-1538PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} This is a mass tort case involving the prescription drug OxyContin. The trial court granted a motion for class certification, and the court of appeals affirmed that decision. The parties to the appeal are plaintiffs-appellees, class representatives LaDonna Howland, Ronald Schaffer, Lillian Lakes, Martha Schaffer, and Fred Lakes, and defendants-appellants Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P., P.F. Laboratories, Inc., and PRA Holdings, Inc. (collectively, “Purdue”) and Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Warner v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cullen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Ritt v. Billy Blanks EnterprisesOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API