Legal Opinion
Grover v. Minette-Mills, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 9, 1994PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
The defendants, Minette-Mills, Inc., John W. Pollack and Gary P. Goldfarb, appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County, Delahanty, C.J.) on a jury verdict awarding compensatory and punitive damages to the plaintiff, Robert E. Grover, on his complaint alleging their tortious interference with the contract between Grover and Bates Fabrics, Inc. They contend that the trial court erred in (1) seating an allegedly biased juror, (2) failing to correct an allegedly improper statement in Grover’s closing argument, (3) refusing to grant a requested jury…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Miller v. SzelenyiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Hanover Insurance Co v. HaywardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- McLain v. Training and Development Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- June Roberts Agency, Inc. v. Venture Properties, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Costos v. Coconut Island Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Fitzgerald v. GamesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Rutland v. MullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.