Legal Opinion
Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Kaplus
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 12, 1965No. Civ. A. 641-64PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 56 (P.R.C.P.) with supporting affidavit for summary judgment. Defendants have not filed a counter affidavit and the facts asserted in plaintiff’s affidavit in accordance with Rule 56(e) stand admitted for the purposes of this motion.
The pertinent facts are: Plaintiff is a corporation of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico with its principal place of business at San Juan. Defendant Samuel R. Kaplus, is a citizen of the State of New Jersey and defendant J. Kaplus & Son, Inc. is a corporation of the State of New Jersey having its principal place…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Simms v. SimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Miguel A. Moreno Rios v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- Metcalf v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Siegmund v. General Commodities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Samuel R. Kaplus and J. Kaplus & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Tirino v. Local 164, Bartenders & Hotel & Restaurant Employees UnionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Andersen v. SchulmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971