Legal Opinion

Siegmund v. General Commodities Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1949No. 12068PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge; ..

Thi's is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a cause against the several appel-lees, who were some, but not all, of the defendants below. The complaint alleged, that the plaintiff, appellant here, was a citizen of Arizona; that defendant, General' Commodities Corporation, one of the ap-pellees, was a corporation organized under the laws of Hawaii; that the remaining ap-pellees were citizens of the Territory of Hawaii.

Jurisdiction of the district court was invoked on the ground of diversity of citizenship under the Act of April 20, 1940, c. 117, 54 Stat. 143, 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Lockerty v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Hepburn & Dundas v. EllzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  5. Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Tashiri Wayne WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  5. Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Samuel R. Kaplus and J. Kaplus & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API