Legal Opinion

Illinois Cent. R. v. Mississippi Railroad Commission

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided April 14, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suits by the Illinois Central Railroad Company and by the Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Company against the Mississippi Railroad Commission and others. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

The applications of the two plaintiffs were submitted together for decision, and the questions presented by each are identical. In each instance, an injunction is sought by the plaintiff railroad company against the Mississippi Railroad Commission *249and its three members to prevent them, as the state board for the assessment of railroad property and privileges for taxation: (1) From certifying to the county tax officials the valuation of the property of the plaintiffs, as arrived at by the Commission, upon the ground that the plaintiff’s property had been intentionally…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Baltic Mining Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Republic Acceptance Corp. v. De LandDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1921
  3. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  4. Pullman Co. v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API