Legal Opinion
Republic Acceptance Corp. v. De Land
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 1, 1921No. 420PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Republic Acceptance Corporation against Charles J. De Land and another. On motion to dismiss bill of complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint. The grounds on which such motion is based are stated therein as follows:
“(1) That plaintiíí has an adequate remedy at law. (2) That this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the same: (a) Because said bill of complaint does not state a cause of action arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States; (b) because this court is without jurisdiction to restrain the officers of the state of Michigan from enforcing the penal laws of the state; (c) because this court, under section…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Keeney v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Looney, Attorney General of Texas v. Crane CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Bishop v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- City of Huntington v. Huntington Water Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937