Legal Opinion

Howland v. Doyle

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1935No. Civ. 9422Published

1Opinion of the Court

6 Cal.App.2d 311 (1935)

LOTTIE E. HOWLAND et al., Appellants,

v.

ELMER G. DOYLE et al., Defendants; REO DENNIS COMPANY, INC. (a Corporation), Respondent.

Civ No. 9422.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.

April 19, 1935.

Paul Nourse and Forrest A. Betts for Appellants.

Goodwin J. Knight and Knight & Reynolds for Respondent.

Fricke, J., pro tem.

This is an action to recover damages for a death resulting from the negligent operation of a motor truck. The trial court granted the motion of defendant Reo Dennis Company for a nonsuit and the jury returned a verdict for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grantham v. OrdwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Bradford v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Boland v. GosserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Gammon v. WalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Howland v. DoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API