Legal Opinion

State v. Peoples

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1983No. 8212SC488PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress the in-court identification of him by Borden’s nightshift supervisor, Mr. Steven Reams. He contends that the identification was tainted by a prior one-on-one confrontation between the witness and the defendant. Confrontation occurred on the day Miller was brought to the police station for a photographic lineup. After identifying the defendant from a set of six photographs, Reams again pointed him out as the robber when police officers inadvertently allowed the witness to view the defendant in a hall while,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API