Brady v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants are entitled to an in camera inspection of the requested files by Special Term as they have made a showing of facts sufficient to warrant review pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-a. It is reasonably likely that the requested files contain information which is material and relevant to an issue raised by the plaintiffs in their complaint — damage to their future careers. Since the confidential files may well reflect on the ability of the plaintiffs to advance their police careers, an in camera disclosure is ordered (People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543; Wunsch v City of Rochester, 108…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wunsch v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madsen v. United Television, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Meder v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Walker v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994