Legal Opinion
Wunsch v. City of Rochester
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Elizabeth W. Pine, J.
Plaintiff, in these two civil actions, seeks an order compelling disclosure of eight categories of material.
At oral argument, counsel for Bareham Security indicated that his client could readily respond to Item No. 7 but suggested that such records would not be material in this action. The court finds that documents showing the names of the Bareham Security employees working at the Rochester War Memorial on the night of August 28, 1978 (the *855date of the incident) appear material, and the court orders that they be produced. At oral argument, counsel for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cirale v. 80 Pine Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. KeatingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Doolan v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Langert v. TenneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- King v. CondeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Evening News Ass'n v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Dorsett v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Jones v. JenningsAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Burke v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.