State v. McDonald
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
The defendant, Thomas McDonald, appeals from a jury verdict which found him guilty of petit larceny. Error is assigned to the trial court’s failure to direct a verdict of not guilty.
We are required to test the sufficiency of the evidence by considering only that evidence most favorable to the state and drawing every reasonable inference there from. If there is substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict, it must stand. State v. Basford, 76 Wn.2d 522, 457 P.2d 1010 (1969); State v. Hendrickson, 1 Wn. App. 61, 459 P.2d 55 (1969).
Defendant contends there is no proof he secreted, withheld…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. BrewsterWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- City of Seattle v. SchafferWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JoyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986