Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Nordby

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1986No. 51996-0Published

1DissentUtter, J.

(dissenting) — The Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 provides a structure for the exercise of discretion by public officials. The trial court escaped the confines of this *520structure to impose a sentence outside the act's presumptive sentencing range. I do not agree with the majority that two of the reasons articulated by the trial court justify the exceptional sentence imposed. First, the "particular vulnerability" of the victim as a pedestrian, while true, is present in too many vehicular assault cases for this one to be characterized as exceptional. Second, allowing a prosecutor to present proof…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CaliguriWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. CostelloWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. Van HigsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API