Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2012No. Docket 143733PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, J.

This criminal law case involves a defendant who was not informed of the maximum sentence that could be imposed on him before he pleaded guilty. MCR 6.302(B)(2) requires that the court notify a defendant of the maximum possible prison sentence. Defendant pleaded guilty of second-degree home invasion as a second-offense habitual offender, but the trial court never advised him of his maximum possible sentence as an habitual offender. We ordered oral argument on defendant’s application for leave to appeal to determine if the *687court rule requires such notice.1 We also asked the parties to address…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Blankenship v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. FranciscoMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. People v. Al-SharaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. People v. BlantonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. People v. MartinezMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People of Michigan v. Edward Duane Pointer-BeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. People v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API