Legal Opinion

Street v. Shull

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 1933No. 4-2953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

On November 8,1930, the appellant, Dr. H. N. Street, brought suit in the court of common pleas in Lonoke County against the appellee, O. L. Shull, to recover for professional services as a physician, the same having been rendered at various times between February 13, 1920, and July 23', 1929. The appellee filed an answer and cross-complaint, in which cross-complaint he alleged that Dr. Street was indebted to him in the sum of $360, the pri.ee of an automobile purchased from him by one Woodall which appellant agreed to pay by deducting from Woodall’s salary (Woodall was then in the doctor’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. McClintockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. American Bank & Trust Co. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Pratt v. FrazerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Quaile & Co. v. William Kelly Milling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Barr v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Insured Lloyds v. MayoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. OrmondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Kaplan v. SchererSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. O'Guinn Volkswagen, Inc. v. LawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Cairns v. WittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API