Holland Banking Co. v. Continental National Bank
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Dissent
RAGLAND J.
(dissenting) : — Being unable to concur in the majority opinion and finding the statement of facts therein inadequate from my point of view, I shall set forth what I deem to be the controlling facts — all of them, and then what seem to me to be the necessary conclusions of law with reference to such facts.
THE FACTS.
This is an action at law to recover damages for an alleged conversion of personal property. The petition is in two counts: the first charges a conversion of $25,000 and the second that of $75,212.55. The plaintiff is the State Commissioner of Finance, in charge of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aldrich v. Chemical National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Rankin v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- City of St. Louis v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Kegan v. Park BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Michael v. BaconSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.