Legal Opinion

Brown v. Bedell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, Ch. J.

The action is to recover the balance due on a promissory note or the same balance due for money lent. It. involves the construction of a pooling or syndicate agreement which reads as follows: “ The undersigned hereby form a syndicate for the purpose of dealing in the capital stock of the Broadway National Bank & Trust Company of New York. The syndicate shall be dissolved and terminate sixty days-from the date hereof, but it may be terminated in the discretion of the managers prior thereto. Walter E. Bedell, chairman, Myer Davidow and Louis -Eisenberg are hereby appointed as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Williams v. Inhabitants of MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Craighead v. . PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Darling v. BuddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Bouchard v. First People's TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bank of New York Mellon v. CroninAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Greate Bay Hotel v. Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Burgoyne v. JamesNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. Brown v. Bedell, AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API