Legal Opinion

Chase v. Middleton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Grove, J. Bill by Frank R. Chase and George Banks against Cíiarles W. Middleton, executor of the estate of Edward Middleton, deceased, Albert W. Middleton, Cass T. Wright, Nathaniel Havens, and the township of Oakfield, for an injunction and other relief. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

At an early day there were in Oakfield township, Kent county, five lakes, whose overflow found its way northward to the Flat river, as follows, viz.: From Horseshoe lake to Woodbeck lake; thence to Stock or Banks lake; thence to Thomas lake; thence to McClellan lake, whose outlet emptied into Black creek; which, after receiving the waters of Clear creek, emptied into Flat river; upon which, some miles below, were the *649dams and mills of Edward Middleton and Cass T. Wright. The accompanying diagram will serve to show the relative positions of the lakes and their surroundings:

John and George…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Elmore v. Drainage CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cooney v. Town of HartlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Clark v. Inhabitants of EastonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Goddard v. Inhabitants of HarpswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892
  5. Dawson v. Township of AureliusMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Felton v. WedthoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Maffei v. Berrien CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Board of Education v. SawyerSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API