Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Township of Aurelius

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1882PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Ingbam. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is an action of assumpsit to recover the amount of a drain tax, which plaintiff had paid to the township treasurer under protest, and which the treasurer had subsequently paid out on the order of the township board. The proceedings in laying out the drain were found to be illegal, by reason of the failure of the drain commissi oner, to comply with' certain provisions of the statute, and the ground •of recovery relied upon is that the township has received the plaintiff’s money without right, and lias appropriated it to the use of others without authority of law.

On the finding of facts…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. Searight Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Albert v. GibsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Taylor v. Township of AvonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Camp v. Township of AlganseeMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Maffei v. Berrien CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API