Legal Opinion

Earnest v. Joe Works Chevrolet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 21, 1988No. 87-331PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict for the defendant in a property damage claim.

In August, 1983, appellant Lloyd Earnest purchased a new 1983 truck from Joe Works Chevrolet. After a few weeks, appellant had trouble with the truck flooding and missing. Sometimes the car would surge forward while being driven and at times it failed to start. There was a problem of black smoke coming from the exhaust. Appellant took the truck to the dealer in January or February of 1984, and the fuel pump was replaced…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glidewell, Admin. v. Arkhola Sand Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Dollins v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Megee v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Service Communications, Inc. v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nucor Corp. v. KilmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Young v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Barker v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Arkansas Kraft v. CottrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Wagner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API