Legal Opinion
Fusco v. City of Albany
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold J. Hughes, J.
The defendant City of Albany moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, and the plaintiff cross-moves for an order dismissing the first affirmative defense in the city’s answer, or compelling it to provide access to certain municipal records.
The action is to recover for personal injuries and derivative loss allegedly sustained by the plaintiffs on August 30, 1982, when Mary Fusco fell while walking upon a city sidewalk. The city’s amended answer pleads a first affirmative defense that plaintiffs have not complied with Local Laws,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M. Farbman & Sons, Inc. v. New York City HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Blake v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Klimek v. Town of GhentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Blake v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- John T. Brady & Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. RossiJustice Court of Village of Muttontown · 1992
- People v. BrownRochester City Court · 1996