Legal Opinion

Thompson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided July 28, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 7154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNNE, Chief Judge.

This cause was submitted upon plaintiff’s amended complaint and defendant’s amended motion to dismiss.

Basing his claim on the so-called Washington Job Agreement of May, 19361, plaintiff, alleging that as the result of coordination2 between two carriers he has been deprived of employment3, seeks to re*901cover the coordination allowance 4 provided by the agreement.

Asserting that the primary jurisdiction of this action is in the National Railroad Adjustment Board, defendant seeks to have this action dismissed on the authority of Slocum v. Delaware L. & W. R. Co., 339 U.S. 239, 70…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. KoppalSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. LowdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Payne v. Pullman Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  3. Arnold v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1960
  4. Lee v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  5. Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API