Legal Opinion
United States v. Locke
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 1999No. Civil Action No. 96-344 ERIE, Criminal No. 95-9 EriePublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is a motion by Petitioner Jay Harry Locke to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons that follow, Locke’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In March 1995, a federal grand jury returned a ten-count indictment charging Locke with various firearm and drug-related offenses. A superseding indictment was returned on May 17, 1995, adding eight counts of alleged money laundering.
On November 27, 1995, Locke pleaded guilty to four of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Peguero v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Albert Sally, A/K/A "Pj" Albert SallyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. DialloDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007