United States v. Diallo
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARDIMAN, District Judge.
On April 12, 2006, a jury convicted Defendant Mamadou - Diallo (Diallo) of trafficking in counterfeit goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320(a). 1 ' Diallo’s Motion .for Judgment of Acquittal pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is the subject of this Memorandum Opinion.
I. Introduction
On October 26, 2005, a grand jury issued a one-count indictment charging Diallo with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2320(a). The indictment read, in pertinent part:
[Diallo] did intentionally traffic, and attempt to traffic, in goods, those being…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.