Legal Opinion

United States v. Diallo

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 2007No. 2:05-mc-00324Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HARDIMAN, District Judge.

On April 12, 2006, a jury convicted Defendant Mamadou - Diallo (Diallo) of trafficking in counterfeit goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320(a). 1 ' Diallo’s Motion .for Judgment of Acquittal pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is the subject of this Memorandum Opinion.

I. Introduction

On October 26, 2005, a grand jury issued a one-count indictment charging Diallo with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2320(a). The indictment read, in pertinent part:

[Diallo] did intentionally traffic, and attempt to traffic, in goods, those being…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API