Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 2013No. 24A01-1210-CR-469PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

Jerry A. Smith (“Smith”) brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion to dismiss the charges against him. Smith contends that further prosecution in state court after his plea of guilty to charges of federal conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud is barred by statutory double jeopardy principles. The State cross-appeals from the trial court’s order granting, in part, Smith’s motion to dismiss.

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Between 2004 and 2010, Smith and Ja-sen…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Romine v. GagleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Hendrix v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Baird v. ASA COLLECTIONSIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jerry A. Smith v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Jerry A. Smith v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Jerry A. Smith v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Justin R. Hogg v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Naveen Rajamony v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API