Legal Opinion

Durflinger v. Arnold

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 22, 1927No. Gen. No. 8,024PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Niehaus

In this case an appeal is prosecuted from a judgment rendered in the circuit court of McLean county in favor of the appellee, 0. W. Durflinger, for the sum of $2,468.60 against the appellants, Charles Frank Arnold, Imo M. Mathers, Ruby I. Fossett, Bernice R. Richardson and Grace E. Arnold, as devisees of the estate of Joseph Arnold, deceased. The right to recover the judgment is based on the provisions of sections 11 and 12 of the Act of Frauds and Perjuries, ch. 59 of the Revised Statutes, Cahill’s St. ch. 59, fifí 11, 12. The facts relied on as a ground of recovery are stipulated by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ryan v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  2. People ex rel. Sexton v. BrooksIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Branger v. LucyIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Guy v. GericksIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Campbell v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API