Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Clark

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 25, 1934No. Gen. No. 8,547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Huffman

Defendant in error brought an action of debt against plaintiffs in error, the administrator and devisees of Edward Stahl, deceased. The suit is based upon sections 10, 11 and 12 of the Statute of Frauds and Perjuries, Cahill’s St. ch. 59, lift 10-12. Defendant in error held two promissory notes executed by the deceased, upon which there was a total balance due of $1,399.94. Edward Stahl died testate on December 28, 1928. By his will be devised and bequeathed his estate to Ms widow Christiana Stahl for her natural life, with remainder in equal portions to his five children,' who with said…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mackin v. HavenIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Ryan v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  3. People ex rel. Sexton v. BrooksIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Durflinger v. ArnoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Branger v. LucyIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Danvers Literary & Library Ass'n v. SkaggsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  2. Drake v. DilatushDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API