In re C.M.T.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, J.:
¶ 1 In this appeal from an order of the juvenile court adjudicating a high school student dependent, we address the burden of proof required to establish that a child is “habitually and without justification truant from school” under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 6302. We hold that the Commonwealth bears the burden of proving that the truancy is “without justification.” We further hold that in this case, the hearing court *351erred in refusing to allow appellant to present evidence to justify her absence from school. For these reasons, we vacate the order and remand for further proceedings.
¶ 2 C.M.T.,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ettinger v. Triangle-Pacific Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Matter of DeSavageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Zieber v. BogertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In the Interest of C.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- In the Interest of J.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Interest of K.J.V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- A.J.B. v. M.P.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- State v. BradleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.