Legal Opinion

Drake v. TOWN OF MANSFIELD

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 28, 2009No. 3:08 CV 1659(MRK)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff Richard Drake sued Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff the Town of Mansfield (“the Town”) for refusing to allow him to resume his job as a firefighter after he was diagnosed with a meningioma (a benign brain tumor). Mr. Drake brought his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., and the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 46a-51 et seq. See Pl.’s First Am. Compl. [doc. # 17]. The Town then filed a Third-Party Complaint…

2Cases cited13 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Holcomb v. Iona CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
Hollie M. Williams v. Utica College of Syracuse University, and Burns International Security Services Corp., Docket No. 05-1898-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.