Legal Opinion

Ætna Life Ins. v. Hoppin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 12, 1914No. 2023PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of Illinois; J. Otis Humphrey, Judge. Ejectment by the iEtna Life Insurance Company against Franklin M. Hoppin and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff in this action of ejectment. The cause was submitted to the court; without a jury, on an agreed statement of facts. Judgment was for defendants.

In 1862 Fassett, owner in fee of land in Illinois, deeded it to “Franklin Hoppin and Sarah Hoppin, his wife, during their natural lives and the life of the survivor of them, and at the death of the survivor to the heirs of the body of said Sarah, their heirs and assigns.”

Franklin died in 1865; Sarah, in 1908. In 1862, when the Fassett deed was made, defendants Hoppin and Garland, son and daughter…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. De Vaughn v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Bond v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Security Trust Co. v. Black River National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Charles Cushman Co. v. MackesySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  2. Creekmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Grace v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Swepston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API