Legal Opinion

Appeal of Francis Lorette

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 31, 2006No. 2006-125PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (Board) that the petitioner, Francis Lorette, is entitled to a valueless permanent impairment award under RSA 281-A:32 (Supp. 2005). The petitioner argues that the Board erred in calculating his average weekly wage as zero upon the basis that he was unemployed at the time of his permanent impairment assessment. We reverse and remand.

*272The parties stipulated to the following facts before the Board. On October 7, 1996, the petitioner was injured while working for the respondent, Seppala Construction Company. At the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Appeal of RainvilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  2. Ranger v. New Hampshire Youth Development CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Town of Hinsdale v. Town of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Lessard v. City of Manchester Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. In re LapinskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Appeal of MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. Appeal of Anheuser-Busch Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. Cayten v. New Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API