Legal Opinion

In re Lapinski

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 24, 1985No. 84-245PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this petition for certiorari, we are asked to determine the basis on which a scheduled permanent impairment award under RSA 281:26 (1977 & Supp. 1983) is to be calculated where the injury and the permanent impairment occurred years apart and where the degree of permanent impairment itself was in dispute.

The petitioner, Diana Lapinski, now thirty-eight years of age, suffered a work-related back injury on September 11, 1975, while *774working as an administrative secretary for Sanders Associates, Inc. She was immediately eligible to collect workers’ compensation benefits and received a weekly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ranger v. New Hampshire Youth Development CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Fogarty v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  3. LeBrun v. Woonsocket Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  4. Petition of Dependents of DoranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Cooper v. Roy M. Wright, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re of AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. In re MarkievitzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. In re CorreiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  4. Miracle v. Workers' Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In re L'HeureuxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API